Economic Review

Mar/Apr, 1991

Nonneutrality of Money in Classical Monetary Thought

Thomas M. Humphrey

Contrary to the strawman “classical” model of the textbooks, the original classical economists did not believe that money-stock changes affect only the price level and not real output and employment. Most classicals saw money as having powerful short-run real effects and perhaps some residual long-run effects as well. Concern for money’s impact on real activity strongly influenced the classicals’ views of the desirability or undesirability of monetary expansion and contraction.

Contact Us

Karl Rhodes
(804) 697-8144